Forgot your password? Create an account
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
News

Stockwave Online กระแสหุ้นออนไลน์ หุ้น หลักทรัพย์ การเงิน ข่าวเศรษฐกิจ

Home Forum
Stockwave Board
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
not possession of "illegal" guns (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: not possession of "illegal" guns
#32395
163bvyf3w (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 421
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
not possession of "illegal" guns 12 Years, 6 Months ago Karma: 0  
鈥?the employee is posting or texting as a part of an employee discussion of the workplace, the actions are protected by the National Labor Relations Act.
Opponents argue that this threatens the town character. Oh,gucci outlet, please. It's nowhere near downtown,louis vuitton handbags, and Netflix's current campus across the freeway is about the same height.
More articles in this section Control over the Middle East became a focal point in the superpowers鈥?policy after oil was discovered in the region. Since April 2012,gucci bags, Al Qaeda-related groups are establishing Sharia law on territories under their control following the Taliban scenario. European Union is concerned about repeated cases of violence along with impunity in governmental structures.
On Thursday,Prada handbags, Blaney,gucci bags, 73, talked about how he had filled in for Calhoun in the 2009 opening round victory over Chattanooga. How the next morning Calhoun had called him,goo.gl/z2SlI, pumped he was getting out of the hospital and could coach the next game against Texas A M. Blaney didn't say much in response.
6/9/2013 6:00:00 AMGuest Column: Wrong on guns,cheap true religion, and a traitor tooJeff JacobsonKingman ResidentRegarding the article published on April 25 by national columnist Joe Conason ["Who's 'soft on crime' now?"]:The NRA has been very tough on crime - unlike the leftists,celine handbags, who are tough on law-abiding citizens and protect criminals - but they recognize that background checks are but another step toward total disarmament/subjugation of free individuals that will enable progressives the freedom to prohibit other things - like free speech,tory burch outlet, etc. - by taking away the fourth check and balance against tyranny, the armed citizen.The left clearly does not care about crime or our safety. If the left really cared about safety from crime, they would protect gun owners and praise them for the 2.5 million times per year they protect our country from crimes. Look how lopsided these figures are in favor of private gun ownership: 19,Prada outlet,000 actual crimes (not possession of "illegal" guns,foceng.com/chaneloutlet.html, etc.) versus 2.5 million crimes stopped by gun owners; 11 percent collateral damage by law enforcement versus 4 percent for civilians; and the civilian does not even fire the weapon 92 percent of the time. These powerful statistics prove civilian gun ownership prevents many times more crimes than it causes.Conason is incorrect about how and where guns are purchased by criminals. It has long been proven that background checks do not prevent crime,Burberry Sale, but criminals do not buy from stores. In most cases, officials simply do not know exactly how the guns were attained. They can trace the original purchases by the original sales information that they catalog based on background checks,Chanel bags, etc., but this is far from proof that these people are "straw buyers" and furthermore,true religion outlet, it is likely only the beginning of the ownership trail. This said, let's address Conason's clearly anti-Constitution/freedom stance on this issue. We are guaranteed the right to speak our mind; we have a right to assemble peacefully; we have the right to fight against oppression (by civilians or governments); and we have a Constitution that the leftists know guarantees these rights, yet they try to use subordinate laws to take away these rights.Regarding background checks,http://goo.gl/K9aYn, I think most would agree to them if they could believe that government could do so without keeping records of gun ownership that could be used in future oppressive laws. For example,http://www.foceng.com/celine.html, California has pending legislation to outlaw all semi-automatic weapons that would be retroactive (no grandfather clause),pradaoutletbcc, giving California the authority to confiscate guns. This violates the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights and the prohibition against "laws of ex-post facto." At this time,pradaoutletbcc.com, California is already using records of gun sales compiled since 1996 to confiscate firearms from supposed criminals, but remember their list isn't just comprised of criminals - it is comprised of people convicted of violating laws regarding possession of certain firearms that the California government illegally prohibits,celine handbags, but that the Constitution guarantees we can "keep and bear." Mr. Conason is not only wrong,chanel sunglasses, but treasonous,louboutin pas cher, in that he wants to use state and federal law to violate our Bill of Rights protections. The NRA is protecting our gun rights and every other right that we as Americans cherish.Shame on all of you who support the leftist/progressive effort to harm freedom. Not only should you be ashamed,Chanel bags, but you should be prosecuted as traitors!
相关的主题文章:


People do call 911

In her meticulously researched and entertaining "The Girls of Atomic City

at the Jewish Federation of Western Connecticut

called Ned臎le velikono膷n铆

gen23253
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop

Login

Forgot your password? Create an account
mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday1144
mod_vvisit_counterAll days1144

We have: 1144 guests online
Your IP: 216.73.216.0
Mozilla 5.0, 
Today: Dec 20, 2025

3955488